{"id":13115,"date":"2013-02-17T21:49:35","date_gmt":"2013-02-17T21:49:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alternativejonestown.com\/?page_id=13115"},"modified":"2024-04-24T09:29:47","modified_gmt":"2024-04-24T16:29:47","slug":"laytonmemo","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/?page_id=13115","title":{"rendered":"Carolyn Layton&#8217;s Analysis of Future Prospects"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Among the thousands of anonymous documents that the State Department and FBI recovered in Jonestown after November 18 was an unsigned, undated memo entitled \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/LaytonMemo.pdf\">Analysis of Future Prospects<\/a>.\u201d It proposes and discusses a variety of options for the people of Jonestown: organizing the return of everyone back to the United States; facilitating the return of those people who express a desire to return but leaving the balance of the community intact; migrating \u2013 either en masse or as a small group \u2013 to another country like Cuba; and taking a \u201cfinal stand.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There are numerous references to death throughout the five-page document, beyond the ultimate option. Some are almost casual, indicating how deeply embedded the subject was in general conversation and how inured the people of Jonestown had become to the prospect of self-destruction. For example, in discussing whether their own actions \u201cin playing brinkmanship (which I agree we have to constantly do)\u201d might lead Embassy consul Richard McCoy to involve the \u201cfull force\u201d of the U.S. against them, the writer says, \u201cIf we decide to die, then of course that will not matter because if [it] would not hurt us historically since he is a real pig anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Although there are a couple of references to \u201cJJ,\u201d the memo is addressed in the second person and is undoubtedly directed to Jim Jones. Equally as certain is the writer: Few people would have been able to write as strategically, frankly, and critically as Carolyn Layton, Jones\u2019 most trusted aide.<\/p>\n<p>There are other clues of Carolyn Layton\u2019s authorship as well.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The writer speaks of witnessing Jones\u2019 reaction when \u201cMJ [Marceline Jones] gets totally freaked out,\u201d not an incident the leadership would show to the community at large.<\/li>\n<li>Most other Temple memos referring to Annie Moore call her by her full name, or at least \u201cAnnie M.\u201d Her sister \u2013 Carolyn Layton \u2013 would not make that full reference, and doesn\u2019t.<\/li>\n<li>Probably most conclusive is the reference to Carolyn Layton\u2019s son, Kimo. On page 5, in the discussion of going to Cuba, the memo reads: \u201cOne alternative \u2026 is you and the children going to Cuba.\u2026 We could try to hold the project together here and I would hope that I could see Kimo every now and then and perhaps he could visit here too with me.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>More uncertain is the date of the memo. There are references to the pressures brought against Jim Jones in the Stoen custody case, but those had existed for a year prior to November 1978. The fact that it includes the notation \u201cI am 33\u201d means that it was written after July 13, 1978, Carolyn&#8217;s 33rd birthday. However, given the urgency \u2013&nbsp;bordering on desperation \u2013&nbsp;of the memo\u2019s tone, and the specificity of the issues to consider in deciding \u201chow are we going to do it\u201d \u2013 \u201cHow would you convince Stephan [Jones], or would you?\u201d \u2013 it seems more likely that Carolyn wrote it weeks rather than months before November 18.<\/p>\n<p>A 2009 commentary on this memo appears <a href=\"http:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/?page_id=30902\">here<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Analysis of Future Prospects,<\/strong> RYMUR 89-4286-X-3-e-32a \u2013 X-3-e-32e<br \/>\n<span class=\"tabbed\"><a href=\"http:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/LaytonMemo.pdf\">PDF<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n<span class=\"tabbed\"><a href=\"http:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/?page_id=13116\">Text<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Array<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":13109,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-13115","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13115"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13115\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":126939,"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13115\/revisions\/126939"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13109"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jonestown.sdsu.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}