Serial 1979
Mar 7, 1979 • 1755 • Georgetown-State • 1028

[Editor’s note: This is a State Department cable that was included in the FBI’s 2009 RYMUR release of documents under the Freedom of Information Act. It was not included in the State Department’s own release, but we have included identifying information for it using the agency’s designations.]

UNCLASSIFIED FBB 933

[Listing of agencies receiving informational copies on pdf]

0 071755Z MAR 79
FM AMEMBASSY GEORGETOWN
TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9139
UNCLAS GEORGETOWN 1028
E.O. 12065: NA
TAGS: CARR, (LAYTON, LARRY) (PEOPLE’S TEMPLE)
SUBJ: ARRESTS – LARRY LAYTON
REF: GEORGETOWN 2918 [0918] AND PREVIOUS

1. Chief Justice [Harold] Bollers this morning ruled in favor defense contention that order of change of venue from Magistrate of the North West Magisterial District was to the Chief Magistrate of the Georgetown Magisterial District and that the Chief Magistrate did not repeat not have legal authority to delegate the order to another magistrate. Thus entire preliminary inquiry was improperly conducted and therefore resulting indictment was improper.

2. Chief Justice Bollers further pointed out that if change of venue order had been drawn to allow another magistrate of the Georgetown Magisterial District to conduct preliminary inquiry, Magistrate [Krishna Veni] Chinta could not repeat not have done so since her appointment as a magistrate is specific as to the types of cases which she is empowered to hear, i.e., domestic and private criminal matters and does not repeat not include indictable offenses.

3. Bollers acknowledged that his decision, in effect ordering

UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
PAGE 02 GEORGE 01028 071812Z

a new preliminary inquiry, would create a great delay in the case but maintained that proper procedures are essential to justice. Bollers was highly critical of defense attorney McKay, suggesting that McKay’s aim in raising technical objections was to delay the judicial process and to obtain appointment of another justice to try the case who would be more amenable than the Chief Justice to plea bargaining.

4. Department of Public Prosecutions has not yet indicated when it will go ahead with a new preliminary inquiry, which may require the return of witnesses to Guyana from the United States.

5. Comment: Prominent members of the judiciary in the bar have remarked to Emboff [Embassy Officer] that they believe that the defense has tried unsuccessfully to reach an agreement with the court on an acceptable sentence should the defense plead guilty to attempted murder. They share the Chief Justice’s view that the defense delaying tactics are designed to win the appointment of a more amenable trial judge.

Burke [John Burke, American ambassador to Guyana]

Originally posted on August 5th, 2020.

Last modified on July 25th, 2022.
Skip to main content