BB-6-OOOOO1
Analysis of PC members:
Judy Ijames: weak – will probably accomplish something – i.e. nursing – but everything she does will be as a result of being pushed by the office. Slave mentality// self-righteous – lets others do the talking to that asshole – and he senses the weakness. I will try to spend some time talking with her but… I’m afraid she will have a long term dependency on the office. Doesn’t face herself.
Norman Ijames: Asshole deluxe// will never change – only modify to suit our expectations – ie. Lee I. Hostile – infantile self-examination. Prognosis: poor – will have to get him in an extremely controlled environment.
Sandy Parks: Needs to be related to – slave mentality – limited ability at self-examination – but very able to function in a structured routine. I’m spending some time with her – but am afraid it will take the ultimate to help her. Fairly stable and faithful I think.
Joyce P. [Parks]: Superficial – but I like her. Self-motivated as to her own ambitions but in her areas – she is good.
Dale P. [Parks]: naive// purist appearing// limited self-awareness – but I feel is faithful to the office basically.
Ben B. [Bowers]: limited self-awareness – and doesn’t care to either – very intelligent – but doesn’t use it – very dependent type – I feel he must be programmed but can be productive if sat on constantly – needs structure… basically ok. – but has some sick inconsistencies in his personality I feel.
Jim R. [Randolph]: very dependent// passive hostile type// always must deal with him – demanding, do not trust him very much. Must be treated carefully or explosive reaction – little self-awareness – and doesn’t care to.
Jackie: knows nothing about herself or most of what is going on – has checked out on us. very hostile I feel – and not in touch with any of her feelings, don’t know what will help her – she may function empirically until the times comes to do otherwise – then may not have sufficient grasp of theory.
Eva [Pugh]: trust her with money – but wonder about her grasp of theory also – is clannish with those she esp. likes – still feel she is too capitalistic.
Helen [Swinney]: basically like her – and trust all except that family oriented and pride part of her. – image is important with her too.
Lee I [Ingram]: do not trust him at all – he must be constantly kept in check – very hostile and could get out of control i.e. ego – hasn’t changed much over the yrs. except as his wife has forced him – and then not much sinks in. No self-awareness or denies all such knowledge –
Mike P. [Prokes]: basically trust him and even like him somewhat – I feel he is probably a fairly decent person – gets pissy at times with staff women in authority and pushy until relent. Feel he is loyal –
Tim S. [Stoen]: basically trust him – but as with all men – must counter his decisions with the balance of a woman. Devoted to the cause and somewhat more aware of himself. Personally don’t care for him tho.
—–
BB-6-OOOOO2
Mike C. [Cartmell]: of the three men I trust mentioned above – I feel that I probably like him the best – tho it is probably because I haven’t worked with him that much. I have seen him be ass-y but also he has humbled himself to the principle – but now as I think about it – it has seemed that he has done so not without much difficulty. I feel he is dedicated to the principle – but also that he is still chauvinistic. Actually as I think about it – I would put all 3 of them probably in the same category. And also as I think about it again – probably Mike P. is the least chauvinistic. I guess I was thinking more of years of service in the instance of Mike C.
Tish [Leroy]: do not trust her// she is jealous/ petty woman/ of the old school… Don’t feel she knows herself – or cares too/ Is – condescending to all. Is also chauvinistic. Too white. Bourgeuois intellectual. :
Grace [Stoen]: I am beginning to think more of her but… still have a definite ways to go before I like her – appreciate the changes she has made – but cannot forget the price involved – and the knowledge she had all along and her selfishness.
Richard J [Janaro]: childlike// but basically I trust him – tho he is seemingly inconsistant in his discipline and principle first theory. Becomes too self-oriented. Condescending and chauvenistic.
Claire [Clare Janaro]: whiny person// selfish// becomes flustered// do not trust her to keep her head on any decision-making matters. Too dependent, weak person. no gumption.
Don B. [Beck]: basically like him and trust him. Chauvenistic – and at times – respector of persons – ie. – he wouldn’t talk to me the way he would to Bonnie, etc. (not because he related any better – just status) works hard.
Danny K. [Kutulas]: – do not trust him at all. child, selfish/ stunted emotionally – no hope at this time – only to program and control him until. I did used to trust him in the working area – but not even that now.
Edie [Kutulas]: basically like her – also stunted in social developement – sometimes very short and argumentative with others – comes off self-righteous because of this, basically trust her devotion to cause.
Archie [Ijames]: no
Rosie [Ijames]: no
Beckie [Flowers]: careful there// weak areas – lots of needs – has shown character and worthiness.
Phyllis C. [Chaikin]: do not trust her – she is too weak// crazy// I feel she plays games on herself and others – too smart to be doing this, dependent type – doesn’t learn from her experiences, no hope this time around in terms of ultimate emancipation and independence etc. selfish/ childish.
Bonnie [Beck]: carefully trust her – feel she must be closely checked up on in the way you would a bright, lazy child, not in touch with herself – too smart to be playing such games.
Carol S. [Stahl]: – I trust her – but see her as dependent type. And unmotivated at times – slow. Good person tho – and very dedicated to the pffice.
Jim M. [McElvane]: do not trust him – sorry. I feel he is too repressed – too controlled for our own good. Passive hostile type.
Rick C. [Cordell]: do not trust him – ego maniac as most of the men – goody-goody creepy type, ugh!
Barb C [Cordell]. do not trust her – they deserved each other – too ingrown
—–
BB-6-OOOOO3
3/
June C [Crym]: basically like her – and would like to trust her – but not any independent decision making – she needs to become more aware of her hostility and other emotions and work with and around them. Too quiet, and passive.
Laura J. [Johnston]: opens mouth before thinking – but basically a good person, devoted to cause – but dependent, insecure type, spends too much time it seems on intellectualizing the revolution – as do most whites – and assessing their role in it. (all self-involved to a bad extent) manipulating type – as a child would do. Irritating at times – but likable person.
Laurie E. [Efrein]: irritating a good deal of the time. Whiny wonan – flighty at times. Too intellectually in a self-oriented way. Basically trust her desire to work for the R [Revolution].
Mert and Deana [Mertle]: do not trust either of them.
Tim Carter: do not trust him or even like him. I do feel he is sadistic – maybe not much more so than alot of others. Very chauvenistic – needs to suffer in a most definite way. Too white, too intellectual.
Tim C [Clancey]: do not know him – too repressed – too quiet – but he is new…
Steve A. [Addison]: do not trust him basically – tho he has stuck in there – I think it has been with little awareness. I feel he is lost this time around and will follow thru to the end with programming.
Christine [Lucientes]: one side of her is so likeable// the other so selfish and treasonous. Do not basically trust her because of this – tho I think she most definitely knows right from wrong and has a grasp of the theory but too self-oriented// crazy – schizophrenic – but seems to be that in a most controlling manner – manipulative –
Rheavianna [Beam]: do not trust her to be a socialist – she is an ingrained capitalist and self-interest seeker – too family oriented
Jack [Beam]: goes without saying – no
Ava B [Brown]: don’t know her – too quiet – (therefor can’t trust her)
Sue : trust her explicitly too this cause – and the Office – but not to the people – in particular, she is a stable rock when the office is out of town – very capable – and has been more friendly since the last big trip everyone took to PL.
Sharon A [Amos]: trust explicitly to stay and work in the cause – // her scatter-mindedness at times causes me concern. It seems to be almost thought pattern interruption. – (doesn’t happen often – but does happen)
Sandy B [Bradshaw]: trust her very much to stay// too moody – melancholy etc. – lets her feelings (irritations etc.) shown too much. Trust her dedication to the office// but she doesn’t like the people very much. Basic hostility would be bad if ever let loose – genuine hatred for men – and the system that had the unmitigated gall to produce such monsters.
Karen L [Layton]: trust her to stay for good – // she is not the type of woman that I personally like – (too insipid emotionally at times etc.) but I respect her work and cooperation etc. Seems to be a good person.
Carolyn [Layton]: – I miss her very much// she is probably the person I felt the closest with in the work (now MJ is close to talk to also) but I felt a definite affinity with Carolyn. Respect her very much. And enjoyed talking and planning with her. But I would not want her to have to come back to this mess – if she can be working in other ways – that I know would give her greater satisfaction. We can continue as is – don’t feel any pressure that we need her here in this work – we can cont. as is –
—–
BB-6-OOOOO4
4/
Leona [Collier]: respect her// haven’t thought of her leaving – as much as checking emotionally – (with her illness etc.) // trust her with $ dept. and to her counselling when she is into it. she has such hostility to white people – and in general – too repressed.
Jane M [Mutschmann]: was disappointed in her recent behavior – but I feel she is a dependent type person – and not surprised. She is too white – (as I feel alot of people we have are) – and I think she has laziness too – she is kind of pitiful type. Needs definite support – (from women) to feel accepted.
Terry [Buford]: trust her – but I have seen that frenzied side of her that worries me – when she is not extremely uptight – she is a rock// but I have seen her with that “craziness” and feel she needs to be in check – atleast with someone else helping with ultimate decisions// I have also thought she has been quick to make judgements on a decision in the past – and possibly had not thought it out well enough.
Wanda J. [Johnson]: don’t trust her// but kind of feel sorry for her – her aging and obvious insecurities about her sexuality and individuality etc. are kind of sad/ but she is petty in her relating to women – but still I kind of like her – even tho she is a bitch.
Maureen [Fitch]: don’t trust her at all// feels she definitely needs to be related to get under control – but she is so untrustworthy – I am not sure that is possible. She is a bitch – doesn’t trust anyone I feel, too selfish and self-assured – (I don’t even’think she is attractive – and she seems to feel she is so cursed with these good looks etc.) She is a smart bitch too. I worry about her. – If there is anything I can do there – I’d be glad to help if I can.
David [Wise]: he is crazy – I think he should be sent away to the jungle maybe. We can surely find a person to replace him to oversee in L.A. – but he is definitely gone. Don’t trust him at all – maybe hard work over there can burn it out of him…
Paul: needs to look at himself – feel he has basic allegiance to office and the cause. But very young, and impulsive. Extremely chauvenistic.
Harold [Cordell]: goes without saying – don’t trust him – or even like a marshmallow hair on his head.
Dorothy W. [Worley]: don’t trust her// don’t know where she is – her ‘health’ bothers her so much and she feels she can check out on us. Don’t trust that.
- Purifoy: he is so chauvenistic – the type that I feel if we took too much from him – that would be the last we would see of him – (too much I mean in the way of image) he will only face himself piecemeal.
Betty: has improved in facing JR.// but don’t trust her yet – too soon – dependent type etc.
Alice: too quiet – don’t trust that/ Too repressed – esp. in hostility to whites (and authority)
Terry C. [Carter]: like her – basically trust her.
Vicky: basically trust her// but she is no good at decisions – must be strictly controlled.
Anita: don’t trust her too much// she did pick Mike Keeley//
Maria [Katsaris]: like her – and trust her to be with the cause (as long as she is alive) – am not sure how strong she is// so young and bastard father’s influence.
Trisha [Cartmell]: trust her implicitly with the cause – but is very repressed – but
—–
BB-6-OOOOO5
5/
unless she really flips out – she can maintain
Harriet [Randolph Tropp]: don’t trust her// too intellectual etc.
Tom [Adams]: don’t trust him much// he left once – and he is basically is weak person – needs much control and programming.
Dick T. [Tropp]: don’t trust him to decisions – an ego maniac// but don’t feel he would ‘consciously’ hurt the cause.
Andy [Silver]: insipid// weak// naive – but don’t feel he either would ‘consciously’ hurt the cause. – knows nothing about himself.
Jean Brown: trust her implicitly for the cause// like her very much// seems like a good person.
Mary W [Worthspoon]: too quiet – don’t know her too well// kind of like her and trust her dedication (tho I feel it is limited at this point)
Rita: don’t trust her// she is too conniving and suspicious type – doubt that she really believes much about the work// weak, picky type person – dependent.
Phyllis H. [Houston]: I guess has shown some character with Danny – I feel she may be somewhat of a problem – but feel there is no choice.
Kathy T. [Tropp]: basically trust her – she means well// but comes across self-righteous at times. Speaks before she thinks – and doesn’t think things out very well.